FONT

MORE STORIES


District attorney, sheriff say repeal of 1987 law would complicate efforts to fight crime and ensure public safety, contrary to what repeal supporters argue.

Its supporters say approval of Measure 105 would unshackle police and prosecutors to go after people suspected of crimes, regardless of their immigration status.

But District Attorney Kevin Barton and Sheriff Pat Garrett say Washington County voters should reject Measure 105, which would repeal the 31-year-old law that keeps state and local officials out of federal immigration-law enforcement.

A month after the measure qualified for the Nov. 6 ballot, Barton and Garrett came out in opposition to repeal — and so have their counterparts in Multnomah County — although sheriffs in 18 mostly rural counties have announced they support repeal.

Barton said he spoke out because some statements about the 1987 law are just plain wrong.

The law allows police and prosecutors to check the immigration status of someone who is arrested for a crime — being in the United States illegally by itself is treated as a civil infraction — and it permits them to share information about foreign-born nationals in jail. The sheriff's office, which manages the 572-bed jail in Hillsboro, issues daily lists of inmate bookings and releases.

"There are people who claim the current law does not allow cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or does not allow the reporting of crimes by people who are here illegally," Barton said in an interview with The Times. "That's flatly not true."

Barton said he believes the current law has not hindered police or prosecutors from doing their jobs — but its repeal would.

"Our concern is that if the current law is repealed, there might be immigrants who are less likely to report crimes, obtain services, or even show up at the courthouse to testify," he said.

"The other concern is that if that population feels a chilling effect, it makes them even more vulnerable to criminals as targets.

"It was a reason I came forward. There is a direct connection between this law on the books and public safety. When there is a direct connection, I feel it's my obligation to educate the community about what that connection is."

Garrett, through a spokesman, said he would speak against Measure 105 Thursday night (Oct. 11) at a Washington County Public Affairs Forum at the Hillsboro Civic Center.

Measure 105 was sponsored by three state representatives — Greg Barreto of Cove, Sal Esquivel of Medford and Mike Nearman of Dallas, all Republicans — and is supported by Oregonians for Immigration Reform, a group that supports stricter enforcement.

Richard LaMountain of Cedar Mill is a former vice president of the group and one of two scheduled to speak in favor of repeal at the Washington County forum.

"Illegal-immigrant crime can and does harm Oregonians profoundly," LaMountain said. "And yet, thanks to the warped logic of Oregon's sanctuary law, the fact that illegal immigrants are here illegally is what can render them off-limits to law enforcement's scrutiny."

Responding to Barton's specific criticism, LaMountain said:

"Across the state, police and sheriffs will be free — but not required — to detect, apprehend and help remove illegal immigrants on the basis of immigration-law violations alone.

"Can Mr. Barton name one illegal immigrant he knows has been deported for reporting a crime? What prosecutor would want to deport someone who could help him obtain a conviction?"

Campaign so far

So far, Oregonians United Against Profiling has amassed $1.1 million to oppose Measure 105, compared with $42,500 raised by the Repeal Oregon Sanctuary Law Committee. The secretary of state lists other groups involved in the campaign.

Oregonians for Immigration Reform prevailed four years ago, when it sponsored a successful campaign to overturn a 2013 law allowing Oregonians to receive driver cards without proof of legal presence in the United States. (Licenses require such proof.) Measure 88 won majorities in all counties but Multnomah.

The political dynamics are different now. A "yes" vote would repeal the 1987 law; a "no" vote would keep the law.

Washington County, Oregon's second most populous, is also its most diverse of the largest counties. About one-third of its 600,000 people are from racial and ethnic minorities — and one in every six was born outside the United States.

Measure 105 opponents argue that voter approval would open the way for racial profiling, the practice of using race or ethnicity to identify someone who may have committed a crime.

LaMountain termed that argument "preposterous."

"Overwhelmingly, our police officers and sheriff's deputies are people of uncommon integrity, sworn to treat everyone — whatever their race, nationality or creed — equally under the law," he said. "On top of this, they receive substantial anti-profiling training."

DA Barton said that without further legal guidance, law enforcement agencies would be left hanging if Measure 105 passes.

"The sheriff and I are concerned that in doing away with this law that has been on the books for three decades … what will come in its place is a vacuum — and a patchwork of inconsistent regulations," he said. "That creates a danger that affects citizens and noncitizens alike."

Barton described a spate of burglaries in Beaverton, where a man broke into multiple homes to steal women's underwear and commit sexual assaults against women. Investigators found that one of the residents had confronted the suspect during one of the break-ins.

"But she had not reported the crime because she was afraid that as a crime victim, she could suffer immigration-law consequences if she had reported he was doing this," Barton said.

"That is an example where a crime victim, because of concern about immigration consequences, did not call the police — and it led to a second person being victimized and threatened. That is the exact scenario we are trying to avoid."

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

twitter.com/capitolwong

NOTE: Adds comments from Richard LaMountain.

Beaverton council, mayor oppose Measure 105

The Beaverton City Council and Mayor Denny Doyle have declared their opposition to Measure 105, which would repeal a 31-year-old law limiting state and local police in federal immigration enforcement.

The resolution authored by Council President Lacey Beaty, and passed on Oct. 2, says in part:

"At a time when white nationalists are emboldened to promote their anti-American agenda, ending Oregon's anti-profiling law sends the wrong message, and it is not who we should aspire to be.

"Immigrants are a core part of Beaverton's culture and economy, and ending Oregon's anti-profiling law could hurt our reputation as a welcoming city where all our residents can thrive, and diverse and talented entrepreneurs are encouraged to start new businesses."

About one-third of Beaverton residents are from racial and ethnic minorities — and one in five residents was born outside the United States, a slightly higher share than Washington County as a whole.

The council proclaimed Beaverton as a "welcoming city" in 2017.

Oregon law allows elected officials to take stands on ballot measures. But like all public employees, they cannot use public resources to promote or oppose a side.

Doyle presides at council meetings but generally does not vote. He did tell The Times afterward he fully supports the resolution opposing Measure 105 and supporting the 1987 law.

"If the federal government comes to us and says we need to arrest a felon for a specified crime, it's done. But we are not going to do the mundane work (of immigration-law enforcement) at the expense of local taxpayers," Doyle said.

"If people want to quarrel with that stance, that's their right. But I fully support the law, and I hope voters leave the law in place. I'm not seeing a lot of things saying that we need to change."

— Peter Wong

Contract Publishing

Go to top
Template by JoomlaShine