FONT & AUDIO

MORE STORIES


UPDATE: The Oregon Supreme Court wants a response from the Secretary of State by Jan. 14.

KRISTYNA WENTZ-GRAFF / OPB
 - Nick Kristof speaks with media, answering questions about his campaign for Oregon governor, Oct. 27, 2021 at First Presbyterian Church of Portland.The Oregon Supreme Court has given the Oregon Secretary of State until Friday to respond to Nick Kristof's request to keep his name on the ballot for governor in the 2022 election.

The court set the Jan. 14 deadline after Kristof's lawyers asked it to intervene following Secretary of State Shemia Fagan's ruling that he is not eligible to run for governor on Thursday, Jan. 6. The lawyers asked the court to take jurisdiction of the case the following day. They argue the court needs to act soon because the deadline for printing ballots is March 17 and it would be hard to finish the case through the normal appeals process.

"The effect of her decision is that Kristof will be excluded from the ballot unless there is a timely judicial intervention," the filing said. "Kristof thus petitions this Court for a preemptory or alternative writ of mandamus requiring the Secretary of State to accept his declaration of candidacy and submit his name for printing on the primary ballot. With voting rights under unprecedented attack around the country, fidelity to democratic principles — especially to the right of the public to choose its government — has never been more important."

The court will decide whether to take the case after receiving the response.

Fagan ruled Kristof off the ballot on Jan. 6, citing a constitutional requirement for candidates to reside in the state for three years prior to the election. She noted he had lived in New York and voted there while working for the Times as recently as 2020.

Kristof had argued that he grew up in Yamhill, Oregon, and considers it to be his home. He has returned there every summer for the past 30 years, has built an addition on his family farm for his wife and children, and has paid taxes in Oregon since 2019.

Krisof's lawyers filed a nine-page petition and 56-page supporting memorandum with the court asking it to keep his name on the ballot. They argue his candidacy is valid and could be unfairly prevented by the approaching ballot printing deadline. Otherwise Kristof will have to start his appeal in Marion County Circuit Court and proceed through the Oregon Court of Appeals before reaching the Oregon Supreme Court.

Kristof filed as a Democrat for governor on Dec. 20. Fagan's office, which regulates elections, sent him a letter the next day asking for more proof of his Oregon residency.

"Until late 2020 or early 2021, Mr. Kristof lived in New York and has for the past 20 years," Fagan said at a news conference Thursday morning, Jan. 6. "Until recently, he was employed in New York. He received his mail at his New York address. He filed income taxes in New York. And perhaps most importantly, Mr. Kristof voted as a resident of New York for 20 years, including — and this is important — as recently as November 2020."

Kristof responded several hours later during a press conference that characterized the ruling as a political, not legal, decision. He accused Fagan, a fellow Democrat, of being part of an establishment that favors other Democrat candidates for governor such as former Oregon House Speaker Tina Kotek and State Treasurer Tobias Read.

"My willingness to challenge the status quo is the reason state officials want to toss me from the ballot," Kristof said. "This was a political decision, not one based on the law."

Fagan insisted her office reviewed Kristof as it would have any other candidate.

"In the end, our election officials told me it wasn't even a close call," Fagan said. "And while there have been creative legal arguments and an impressive PR campaign, given the evidence, I venture that most Oregonians who are paying attention have reached the same conclusion."

In a previous letter to Fagan's office, Kristof's attorney's said there has only been one Oregon court case that considered the question of whether voter registration determines residency, over a state House seat in 1974. A Marion County judge ruled that "the question of domicile is largely one of intent," a precedent that supports Kristof, who has owned property in Yamhill County since 1993.

Dillon Mullan contributed to this story.


You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts. Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.


RELATED STORIES

- SoS: Nick Kristof does not qualify to run for governor

- Our opinion: Secretary of state should have let Kristof run

- Oregon elections officials say Kristof does not qualify to run for governor

- Does Oregon consider Nick Kristof a resident? It depends.

- Nick Kristof lawyers argue candidate is Oregonian

- Reporter’s notebook: Where Kristof voted shouldn’t matter