In elementary school, Franklin Weekley was diagnosed as “mentally retarded.” He was slow to learn, but quick to act out on impulse. Teachers at his rural school were unequipped to get a handle on him. Weekley ended up spending much of his time at home. Unsupervised, he often would get in trouble.

Weekley fought with his siblings and raged at his neighbors. He was fascinated with fire and explosives, and was quick to run away in frustration. His parents — who also were developmentally disabled — hoped Weekley would grow out of it.

In 2001, that hope went up in smoke — literally — after Weekley set his family home on fire. The family lost everything, including their son, who was committed to a state-run mental facility as a result.

While in state care, Weekley vanished one day. The state agency in charge of his care would claim the developmentally disabled teenager — who had problems dressing himself — ran to Canada. But around 2004, an attorney heard about the disappearance. That attorney told a reporter, and soon after, the reporter filed a public records request with the state agency in charge.

Those records showed that state contractors had found a body in an abandoned building on the property shortly after Weekley’s disappearance.

The records showed the body was badly decomposed, but around the skeleton’s hips was an elastic underwear band with “F. Weekley” written on the tag. A reporter’s investigation found Weekley had run away into an abandoned building and fell down an elevator shaft, where he died.

Shortly after that story was published, the state agreed to pay Weekley’s parents $1.3 million.

Strong public records laws have the ability to right wrongs, hold state workers — including politicians — accountable, and shine a light into the darkest recesses of government — like the bottom of a derelict elevator shaft on state-owned property. Public records laws help keep things honest.

That was the case in Florida, where Weekley died. Yet if that were to happen in Oregon, it’s a good bet that Weekley’s whereabouts would still be unknown. That’s because a public records request for a case like Weekley’s would almost certainly be obstructed by delays, exemption claims, and high costs.

“The current state of public records is poor to pathetic,” said Willamette Week reporter Nigel Jaquiss. “The public agencies have no deadlines to require answers to public records requests, so they often do so slowly and incompletely. Some public agencies use their ability to charge whatever they want in a punitive fashion.”

Jaquiss, a Pulitzer Prize winner for Investigative Reporting, routinely files public records requests — and he said state agencies often find reasons to block requests because they “fear publication of a story that would be embarrassing.”

As Jaquiss noted, there are no deadlines for Oregon agencies to respond to requests, nor are there limits to costs. Even if the agencies do respond, there are more than 500 exemptions to the state’s public records laws. And while some of the exemptions serve the public good by protecting the victims of domestic abuse, or shielding state employee medical information, other exemptions include dog licenses, information about boat accidents, and complaints filed by consumers about insurance companies, manufactured homes, or even the state’s judges.

In comparison, Florida has four exemptions of public records, there are deadlines for when responses must be filed, and costs must correlate with work performed and be clearly outlined.

Legal challenges to this obstruction are often long and costly, and it creates an Oregon where only those with resources have access to transparency.

While the state’s reporters have long complained about the state’s open records laws, national research shows Oregon has some of the weakest open records rules in the country. According to the Center for Public Integrity, Oregon earns an “F” grade in the State Integrity Investigation, which measures “transparency and accountability grades for all 50 states.”

The state also earns an “F” grade measuring the public’s access to information, ranking 34th in the country. For context, Florida is ranked 17th (and neighboring California and Washington ranked 28th and 32nd, respectively).

The Oregon Territory Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists is calling on policymakers to reform Oregon’s open records laws. Our membership believes that if it’s good enough for Florida, it should be good enough for Oregon. We urge the public to support that reform.

And we encourage all journalists and voters to hold policymakers accountable until that reform is achieved.

Public records task force

The Oregon Attorney General’s Public Records Task Force is holding a hearing at 5:30 p.m. May 26, at the White Stag Building in Portland.

The Oregon SPJ Sunshine Committee

Chair: Shasta Kearns Moore, Portland Tribune;

John Sepulvado, OPB;

Lee van der Voo, InvestigateWest;

Nick Budnick, Portland Tribune;

Les Zaitz, Oregonian/OregonLive;

Hillary Borrud, EO Media;

Lori Shontz, University of Oregon.

John Sepulvado, OPB’s “Weekend Edition” host and a member of the Oregon SPJ Sunshine Committee, wrote this on behalf of the Oregon Territory Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists board. Reach the chapter through

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..