Link to Owner Dr. Robert B. Pamplin Jr.



Ron Wyden will stand by panel's recommendation of Danielle Hunsaker for 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, but Jeff Merkley says such positions should be filled by people 'with more extensive experience.' Senate vote is scheduled Tuesday, Nov. 5.

PMG PHOTO BY PETER WONG - The U.S. Capitol at dusk in August 2018. Sen. Ron Wyden will support and Sen. Jeff Merkley will oppose President Donald Trump's nomination of Washington County Judge Danielle Hunsaker to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A Senate vote is scheduled Tuesday, Nov. 5.On the eve of the vote, Oregon's senators will split on the nomination of Danielle Hunsaker, presiding judge of Washington County Circuit Court, to be a federal appeals court judge.

The full Senate is scheduled to vote Tuesday, Nov. 5, on her nomination to succeed Diarmuid O'Scannlain as a judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. O'Scannlain took senior status at the end of 2016, 30 years after President Ronald Reagan named him to the court.

Hunsaker clerked for O'Scannlain for six months in 2008.

Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley forwarded her name on Aug. 28 as one of four potential nominees screened by a panel of Oregon lawyers, and President Donald Trump appointed her the very same day.

Merkley announced Friday he would oppose the nomination.

His full statement:

"I enjoyed the opportunity to meet with Judge Hunsaker, and have received some positive references about her work. 

"I believe, however, that a lifetime appointment to these critically important circuit court positions should be reserved for individuals with more extensive experience to draw upon. I appreciate Judge Hunsaker's service on the state trial court bench in Washington County, but will not vote to confirm her at this time."

But Wyden, through a spokesman, said later he would stand by the recommendation of the panel.

Hank Stern said on Wyden's behalf:

"After meeting with Judge Hunsaker, as well as reviewing her legal and judicial record before and after Governor Brown appointed her to the Circuit Court in Washington County, Sen. Wyden intends to vote yes when this nomination reaches the Senate floor.

"(Wyden) believes Judge Hunsaker has displayed the judicial temperament needed for this position in the more than 3,500 cases the Judiciary Committee noted she has presided over."


Hunsaker, 42, observes her second year as a Washington County circuit judge on Nov. 9. Gov. Kate Brown named her back then to succeed Judge Suzanne Upton, who retired. Hunsaker won a full six-year term in 2018 and Oregon Chief Justice Martha Walters named Hunsaker presiding judge in June, after Judge Charles Bailey resigned that position abruptly in May. Bailey, who defeated a challenger to win a third term in 2018, remains on the bench.

Hunsaker was at the Portland firm of Larkin Vacusa Keyser, where she specialized in complex commercial litigation, from 2009 until she was named a judge in 2017. She was co-counsel for the Port of Portland in the Portland Harbor Superfund Cleanup cost allocation.

She also worked at the Portland firm of Stoel Rives.

Hunsaker earned a bachelor's degree in 2001, and her law degree in 2004, both from the University of Idaho. She was a clerk for Judge Paul Kelly Jr. of the U.S. 10th Circuit in 2004-05, and for U.S. District Judge Michael Mosman in Oregon in 2005-07.

After Trump nominated her on Aug. 28, Hunsaker appeared in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 25, and advanced to a vote of the full Senate after a committee vote on 16-6 on Oct. 24.

The other active judge from Oregon on the 9th Circuit is Susan Graber, who spent 10 years as a state appellate judge — including eight years on the Oregon Supreme Court — before her appointment by President Bill Clinton in 1998.

Except for O'Scannlain, the two other judges from Oregon with senior status — Edward Leavy, appointed by Reagan, and Alfred "Ted" Goodwin, appointed by Richard Nixon — also served many years as judges before they were named to the 9th Circuit.

Hunsaker is Trump's second nominee to fill the O'Scannlain vacancy.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ryan Bounds was the first, and he had been on a list of potential nominees screened by a bipartisan panel and forwarded by Merkley and Wyden. But after the disclosure of some controversial writings for The Stanford Review — an alternative to the independent student-run Stanford Daily — members of the screening panel said they would have rejected his name because of his comments about the rights of minorities and women. Bounds said he was advised only to submit writings from law school and afterward for his confirmation hearing by the Senate Judiciary Committee. He apologized for his comments as opinion editor of The Review, but Wyden said Bounds did so only to salvage his chances.

"He (Wyden) is proud to have spearheaded the defeat of the previous nomination to this 9th Circuit Court of Appeals vacancy of a deeply flawed right-wing extremist," said Wyden spokesman Stern.

The Bounds nomination never came to a Senate vote in July 2018 because South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott — the Senate's only African American Republican — announced he would vote no and deprive it of enough to win. The nomination was withdrawn a few days later.

Bounds, who remains in his job, also clerked for O'Scannlain.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

NOTE: Rewrites with Wyden spokesman comments that senator will vote for nominee. Corrects state for Sen. Scott.

You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts. Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.

Go to top
JSN Time 2 is designed by | powered by JSN Sun Framework