Thousands of Oregonians in limbo as Congress fusses over unemployment benefits
As Congress tussles with the next coronavirus aid plan, more than 130,000 Oregonians are in danger of having their pandemic unemployment benefits interrupted — or even losing the extra $600 per week that Congress approved four months ago.
The acting director of the Oregon Employment Department says unemployed workers would still get all of their money retroactively if they were deemed eligible for benefits as of July 25. The authorization ends Friday, July 31.
David Gerstenfeld said last week that the length of any interruption will hinge on what Congress does or does not do.
"If Congress were to take the most easy-to-implement route of just extending the current program to a future date, we'd probably have a few more days before we would be forced to have an interruption in those payments," he told reporters during a conference call.
"If it is anything other than that, unfortunately, we're likely already at a point where there would be some interruption, because it would take some changes to our computer coding, we would need to look at the processes and train our employees. All of that takes time."
Gerstenfeld estimates his agency has paid out $2 billion in the extra benefits, which Congress included in the $2 trillion CARES Act on March 27.
The House is scheduled to start its summer recess July 31; the Senate, on Aug. 7.
The Democratic-led House acted back on May 15 to pass a $3 trillion plan, which includes a simple extension of the $600-per-week extra benefit through Dec. 31.
The Republican majority in the Senate, however, has balked both at the price tag of the House plan and any extension of benefits. Some critics have argued that the higher unemployment benefits, which are intended as full wage replacement, deter some people from going back to work.
Senate Republicans finally proposed Monday to cut the extra benefit by two-thirds, to $200 per week for two months, and then cap it at 70% of a laid-off worker's income. The Trump administration has proposed a stop-gap extension to buy more time for negotiations with Democrats, but Democrats rejected that idea.
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden is a Democrat who negotiated the original extra benefits with the Republican chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin back in March.
"Senate Republicans and Donald Trump sat on their hands for months instead of working with Democrats, so it looks now like a lapse in benefits is inevitable," Wyden said in a statement on Monday.
"Now Republicans have come forward with a plan that is simply unworkable. State workforce agencies have told the Finance Committee that any changes — even simple ones — could take months to implement. Republicans are talking about cutting supercharged benefits by two-thirds. They're calling for states to make huge, complicated changes to the unemployment insurance program that could hold up benefits until 2021. Some states might not be able to manage them at all.
"This is totally, completely irresponsible. It is cruel. It is legislative malpractice."
Wyden is the top Democrat on the Finance Committee, which writes tax legislation. State unemployment funds draw from employer taxes, although the U.S. Department of Labor sets the guidelines. Benefit levels are set by states.
Wyden's plan would tie future extra benefits to a state's three-month average unemployment rate. For every percentage-point drop below 11%, the benefit would be reduced by $100 until the rate reached 6%.
During the 2007-10 recession, similar economic triggers were used. But they applied only to how long a state could provide regular unemployment benefits, which cover only a portion of lost wages. The maximum period then was extended to 99 weeks, which finally expired in 2013.
Gerstenfeld said if Congress does something other than a straightforward extension, it will take time for his agency and counterparts in other states to get the money out to unemployed workers.
"For some types of extensions being considered, it might be a brief interruption, depending on what they do," he said. "If it's the most complex of the options we've heard about, it could be a significant one. At this point it's hard for us to give people any guidance because we don't know what will pass, if anything."
Last week, Wyden proposed $500 million for states to upgrade their unemployment claims systems.
Oregon has been using a mainframe system dating back three decades, based on a computer language — COBOL — that was first introduced in 1959. Gerstenfeld said his agency is about ready to announce the selection of a vendor for a new system, which has been in the works for almost a decade.
"There's no excuse for workers waiting in line for hours outside state unemployment offices because they can't access websites," Wyden said. "While Congress has provided funds to help states administer supercharged unemployment benefits, more is needed. My bill would provide critical funding and ensure states develop accessible, user-friendly online filing systems."
Gerstenfeld said a recent Google application to the agency's mainframe system, which processes all benefit payments, will help applicants who are newly eligible for unemployment benefits. The CARES Act made self-employed people, independent contractors, freelancers, gig and temporary workers eligible for benefits for the first time since the unemployment began in the 1930s. But it also required state agencies to verify that they do not qualify for regular benefits.
According to agency statistics last week, only 1,108 claims were pending for regular unemployment benefits from a total of 527,100 filed between March 15 and July 18. For the newly eligible workers under Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, 44,563 claims were pending from a total of 106,099 claims.
NOTE: Updates with Senate Republicans unveiling their proposal Monday, July 27, and Democratic Sen. Roin Wyden's response.
You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts. Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.