Portland attorneys accuse U.S. DOJ of moving goal posts
The city of Portland has accused the U.S. Department of Justice of stating incorrect information and misinterpreting police programs while the two sides negotiate how to bring Portland back into compliance with a federal settlement agreement about police use of force.
City attorneys responded in July to the Justice Department's sixth periodic assessment with a line-by-line rebuttal of areas where the city claims the Justice Department is moving the goalposts or simply wrong. OPB obtained a copy of the rebuttal through a public records request.
"The city believed, until recently, that the parties were working under a common understanding of the requirements of the Settlement Agreement," the city's response to the DOJ says. "This year's Compliance Assessment Report, however, revealed numerous areas where a difference in the parties' understanding led to a DOJ finding of only 'partial compliance' with particular provisions."
The Justice Department declined to comment.
The rebuttal was delivered in a closed-door meeting on July 28, one day after the city and federal prosecutors were in court to update U.S. District Court Judge Michael Simon on the city's progress in implementing agreed-upon changes. Ahead of that court appearance, the city filed a more upbeat response to the Justice Department, focusing on areas where the city had been successful.
You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts. Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.