Supreme Court ruling ends Oregon's non-unanimous jury verdicts
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Monday, April 20, that the U.S. Constitution requires unanimous jury verdicts in state criminal courts. The move ends Oregon's history of using non-unanimous juries to find people guilty of crimes other than murder.
Specifically, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the 14th Amendment incorporates a person's Sixth Amendment right to jury unanimity.
Oregon was the last state in the country that utilized a non-unanimous jury law, allowing convictions in many types of cases with an 11-1 or 10-2 decision.
Monday's Supreme Court case was out of Louisiana, though that state had previously ended the practice of non-unanimous juries through a measure approved by voters.
Non-unanimous juries have been part of Oregon's Constitution since 1934, when voters adopted the practice. Legal scholars argue non-unanimous juries are rooted in discrimination, and that Oregon's law was originally intended to silence the voices of Catholic and Jewish immigrants in the state.
OPB is a Portland Tribune news partner.
You count on us to stay informed and we depend on you to fund our efforts. Quality local journalism takes time and money. Please support us to protect the future of community journalism.